A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, has struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, bringing an end to a case that attracted widespread public and political attention.
The charges, which were initiated by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, were linked to statements allegedly made by the senator during a media interview. The Federal Government had accused her of criminal defamation and related offences, arguing that her comments damaged the reputation of certain individuals.
At the resumed hearing, the prosecution informed the court that the Federal Government had decided to discontinue the case. A formal Notice of Discontinuance was presented to the court, indicating that the decision was taken in line with existing legal provisions governing criminal prosecutions.
In his ruling, the presiding judge acknowledged the notice and consequently struck out the charges. The court held that once the prosecution formally withdraws a case, the court is bound to act accordingly. With the charges struck out, the case was removed from the court’s cause list, effectively ending the criminal proceedings against the senator.
The development was welcomed by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan and her legal team, who described the outcome as a relief and a confirmation that the case lacked sufficient legal basis to continue. The senator expressed appreciation to her supporters and reiterated her confidence in the judicial system.
The case had generated strong reactions across the country, with many commentators and civil society groups raising concerns about the use of criminal charges in matters relating to speech and political expression. Supporters of the senator argued that the prosecution could have a chilling effect on free expression and democratic engagement, while others called for greater caution in the use of criminal defamation laws.
With the court’s decision, legal observers say the matter now serves as another reminder of the discretionary powers of the Attorney-General and the importance of balancing state authority with constitutional rights.
The striking out of the charges closes a contentious chapter and allows the senator to focus fully on her legislative duties without the burden of an ongoing criminal case.
